.
Regarding this post and the " solution " by @CPhill, I have two notices.
(1) The plot in the attached file does not correspond / (is not adequate) to the given data.
Indeed, if the radii are 6 cm and 4 cm and the circles do not overlay,
then the distance between the centers can not be less than 6 + 4 = 10 cm,
but with the given data the relevant distance is less than 10 cm.
(2) The solution in the post by @CPhill is INCORRECT.
Indeed, in his solution, @CPhill considers the distance of 8 cm long
as the hypotenuse of the right angled triangle.
But it is incorrect. This distance of 8 cm is one of the LEGS of the right-angled triangle.
Therefore, all that follows in the solution by @CPhill is WRONG.
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Regarding the post by @CPhill . . .
Keep in mind that @CPhill is a pseudonym for the Google artificial intelligence.
The artificial intelligence is like a baby now. It is in the experimental stage
of development and can make mistakes and produce nonsense without any embarrassment.
It has no feeling of shame - it is shameless.
This time, again, it made an error.
Although the @CPhill' solutions are copy-paste Google AI solutions, there is one essential difference.
Every time, Google AI makes a note at the end of its solutions that Google AI is experimental
and can make errors/mistakes.
All @CPhill' solutions are copy-paste of Google AI solutions, with one difference:
@PChill never makes this notice and never says that his solutions are copy-past that of Google.
So, he NEVER SAYS TRUTH.
Every time, @CPhill embarrassed to tell the truth.
But I am not embarrassing to tell the truth, as it is my duty at this forum.
And the last my comment.
When you obtain such posts from @CPhill, remember, that NOBODY is responsible for their correctness,
until the specialists and experts will check and confirm their correctness.
Without it, their reliability is ZERO and their creadability is ZERO, too.